Morgan Stanley Latest to Announce It Blocks Dropbox

Morgan Stanley the Latest to Block Access to Dropbox  

It’s becoming a familiar refrain: To protect the network, a major company must restrict employee access to cloud services, including Dropbox. Investment bank Morgan Stanley has just revealed it has joined the chorus, as well. The company now restricts access to Dropbox and other cloud providers, according to Laszlo Kollar, Morgan’s Stanley’s executive director of global cloud.

Kollar shared this fact at a presentation at the World Cloud Forum, held this past week in London.

With over 60,000 employees worldwide, Kollar acknowledged a problem with “rogue IT.” There are departments contracting their own IT services with cloud computing companies, potentially exposing the bank to security issues and data loss, as well as risking regulatory noncompliance. In response, Morgan Stanley has blocked access to certain cloud providers, at the network layer, rendering them invisible.

It’s common for banks and others companies in regulated industries to block access to consumer-grade file sync and share applications. During research we conducted last year, we found that among the 200 companies we surveyed, 49 percent blocked access to Dropbox. In research we conducted this year with Harris Interactive, we learned over 80 percent of the IT decision makers surveyed thought the adoption of “freemium” file sync and share products by employees created potential security problems.

But let’s be honest: Dropbox and other consumer file sharing apps are popular for good reason. They make it vastly simple to share information, or keep that one important file at your fingertips, no matter what device you’re using. There are huge productivity gains available through the adoption of file sharing technology. But just remember to keep your personal and professional lives separated.

That is why we argue that merely blocking access to these applications isn’t always enough. You must provide a sensible alternative that meets users’ needs, but keeps your company on the right side of regulatory requirements and data privacy laws.

For more information on how you can avoid legal risk in file sharing, check out these four recommendations by law firm Field Fisher Waterhouse.

Similar Articles

2015 Magic Quadrant for Enterprise File Synchronization and Sharing Intralinks


Gartner released its 2015 Magic Quadrant for Enterprise File Synchronization and Sharing report. Intralinks is pleased to be included for the second year.

Risk Based Monitoring Versus Remote Monitoring


Risk-based monitoring and remote monitoring. Many believe that the two words are synonymous and interchangeable. They are not. Here's the difference.

  • djbressler


    You nailed it. “They’re popular for a reason” (and the reason is not to give IT heartburn) and “IT need to provide a sensible alternative” (FTP is not that).


  • Intralinks

    David, thanks for the comment. We see a lot of companies
    taking the first step – blocking access to insecure services – but few taking
    the necessary second step and offering up alternative solutions that keep
    employees productive and data secure. – Ian.